Translated by Sama Marwan,
Three Reasons Why the Global Zionist Lobby and Israel Prefer Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party Candidate, for the U.S. Presidency Over Republican Candidate Donald Trump, Despite Trump Offering Israel Unprecedented Support by Recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital:
First Reason: Kamala Harris’s Asian-African Heritage
Kamala Harris’s background includes an Indian immigrant mother and a Jamaican father of African descent. Since recognizing the changing demographic makeup of the United States, with an increasing number of colored immigrants from Africa, Asia, and South America, the influential Jewish lobby in the U.S. has been promoting colored immigrants, particularly African Americans, to high government positions.
This strategy aims to shift them away from solidarity with oppressed peoples, given their historical experiences of slavery and racial discrimination.
The lobby’s careful and thorough selection process for these sensitive positions is exemplified by Kamala Harris.
Statistics reveal a decline in the number of white Americans of European descent, from 80% at the start of the 20th century to 60% in 2020, with projections suggesting a further decrease to 44% by 2060 and 20% by the end of the century.
The Zionist lobby has been securing the loyalty of these minorities since the late 1980s by advancing them into top and sensitive roles in various U.S. administrations, provided they align with the lobby’s interests. Figures like Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell serve as prime examples of African Americans in critical positions.
Second Reason: Kamala Harris’s Marriage to Jewish Lawyer Doug Emhoff
Doug Emhoff, known for his strong support for Israel, has been instrumental in Harris’s political rise, similar to Barack Obama’s career trajectory.
Despite the difficulty of electing a Jewish president in America, Emhoff’s potential status as the “First Gentleman” of the White House could effectively position him as the de facto leader, benefiting Israel’s interests. Harris’s political ascent, supported by the Jewish lobby, from San Francisco District Attorney to California Attorney General and now a presidential candidate, underscores this influence.
Third Reason: Kamala Harris’s Potential National Loyalty Compared to Trump’s “America First” Stance
Harris, although born in the U.S., is perceived as having potentially weaker national loyalty due to her mixed heritage and immigrant background.
This is seen as advantageous for the Zionist lobby, which might find it easier to influence her compared to Trump, who often prioritizes “America First,” potentially conflicting with Israeli interests.
Trump’s firm stance could risk prioritizing American interests over Israel’s, an unlikely scenario with Harris, given her lack of experience in foreign policy compared to Trump’s established political agenda.
Prominent political science professor Jay Dwight Davis highlights the financial burden on American taxpayers in supporting Israel, contrasting with domestic economic challenges.
This sentiment is echoed by American activist R. Munarsh on social media, criticizing President Biden’s substantial foreign military aid, primarily to Israel, amidst domestic economic struggles.
Lastly, Netanyahu’s recent address to the U.S. Congress, demanding more American military support for Israel, has further fueled American frustration over the perceived imbalance in U.S.-Israel relations.
Conclusion:
The key question remains whether Kamala Harris will mirror Barack Obama’s policies, given their similar career paths, and whether she will uphold or deviate from her public criticisms of Israeli policies, should she win the presidency.
In contrast, Trump faces potential legal challenges if he continues to prioritize American interests over those of Israel.
